Water Splash v. Menon: The Last Post Before The Argument

Just a few things to report on the Water Splash v. Menon case, which the Supreme Court will hear next week. First, here is the petitioner’s reply brief. I am not going to review the reply brief in detail.

Second, Charlotte Garden has previewed the case at SCOTUSBlog. Her account is more sympathetic to Menon’s brief than is mine. She puts the case in a somewhat broader context, too:

The fight over whether or when it is appropriate to look to extra-textual sources in order to discern a text’s meaning will likely seem familiar to many readers. Earlier decisions, including Schlunk, show that the court has previously been willing to look to those sources in the treaty context; oral argument may forecast whether the court’s view on this point has shifted since that case. Beyond that, the key issue to watch during argument is the extent to which the court views treaty interpretation as meaningfully different from statutory interpretation.

Last, the Court has granted the Acting Solicitor General’s motion for leave to participate in the argument as an amicus curiae.

I will post the transcript of the argument and the audio recording as soon as they are available.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.