Lago Agrio: Ecuadoran National Court of Justice Affirms Lago Agrio Judgment In The Main, But Reverses on Punitive Damages

Just a quick note for those who haven’t heard: the National Court of Justice has affirmed the Lago Agrio judgment in part, but reversed on the punitive damage award. The Wall Street Journal has early coverage, and, courtesy of Roger Parloff, I have a copy of the very lengthy opinion.

I don’t think it makes sense to comment too much on the decision until I’ve been able to digest it, but here is what I will be looking for:

  • Did the court consider Chevron’s arguments about corruption in the lower court—either attempts at corruption by the LAPs (e.g. the Cabrera issue) or corruption on the bench itself? If not, did Chevron make those arguments to the court, or was there some other procedural avenue for Chevron to make them?
  • What account, if any, did the court take of the arbitral award that requires Ecuador to suspend the operation of the judgment?

More to come!

About Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman is a shareholder with Murphy & King, a Boston law firm, where he has a complex business litigation practice. He is the author of International Judicial Assistance (MCLE 2d ed. 2016), a nuts-and-bolts guide to international judicial assistance issues, and of the chapter on service of process in the ABA's forthcoming treatise on International Aspects of US Litigation, and he is the publisher of Letters Blogatory, the Web's first blog devoted to international judicial assistance, which the ABA recognized as one of the best 100 legal blogs in 2012, 2014, and 2015.

One thought on “Lago Agrio: Ecuadoran National Court of Justice Affirms Lago Agrio Judgment In The Main, But Reverses on Punitive Damages

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *