Belfast Project Live Blog


Welcome to the Letters Blogatory liveblog of the Belfast Project hearing! I expect to start blogging shortly before the hearing begins, at 2 p.m. EST (7 p.m. GMT). Please join in with your comments and questions, or you can tweet using the hashtag #blogatory. Below the liveblog window, you’ll find the key documents at issue for today’s hearing.

Update (9/21/12): Unfortunately, the company that hosted my liveblog went out of business, so it’s no longer available! I will try to get it back, but no promises.

[blyve id=”167c025077732c65b90f0000″ width=”550″ height=”550″]

Key documents

Here are some key documents relating to today’s hearing.

  1. The mutual legal assistance treaty between the United States and the United Kingdon
  2. Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre’s complaint
  3. Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction
  4. The government’s memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss and in opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction
  5. Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss
  6. The government’s proposed reply brief

5 responses to “Belfast Project Live Blog”

  1. […] Boston-based lawyer, Ted Folkman has been following the legal arguments.  And he’ll be live-blogging today’s hearing [7pm GMT – Added […]

  2. […] Letters Blogatory liveblog of the hearing in the District Court on the government’s motion to dismiss The Moloney and […]

  3. […] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its […]

  4. […] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its […]

  5. […] they had sought leave to assert in the original case. The government moved to dismiss, and after a hearing, the judge granted the motion. M&M again appealed, and its appeal was consolidated with its […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *