Update on the Heller Subpoena

In a new article in the San Francisco Chronicle, Chevron suggests that it subpoenaed Kevin Jon Heller’s gmail account because it didn’t believe that the account belonged to him. This hardly seems credible—Chevron could simply have asked Heller, or it could have done five minutes of googling.

I want to clear up a misconception that several people have had when I’ve discussed this case with them. The subpoena did not, and really could not, call for the contents of Heller’s emails. Under the Stored Communications Act, which I’ve covered before, Chevron would have to serve a subpoena on Heller himself, rather than on Google, to get the emails themselves. Instead, the subpoena called for IP logs and the like.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.