Elephant Habeas Case: The NhRP Really, Really Does Not Want To Litigate Happy The Elephant’s Case In The Bronx

An elephant holding a brush in its trunk and using it to paint paint an elephant

Happy the Elephant has very strong views about venue for her, ah, quixotic habeas corpus case. As I noted in December, a judge in Orleans County, New York, ordered the case transferred to the Bronx, where Happy lives at the Bronx Zoo. Recently, Happy has filed a motion to reconsider and a motion for leave to appeal. All of the papers are available on the website of the Nonhuman Rights Project.

When I say that Happy has strong views, of course I meant that her lawyers, or rather the lawyers (she certainly didn’t hire them!) have very strong views. And the lead lawyer, Steven Wise, has been extremely clear about the reasons why. Courts in the Bronx, he says, “aren’t amenable to his arguments.” Usually when a lawyer seeks a particular venue in the hopes it will be more favorable than some other possible venue, he or she will clothe the choice in some appropriate policy that has something to do with venue: some of the significant events in the case happened in the chosen venue, or one of the parties lives there, or something. Here there is no fig leaf. The choice of venue was forum shopping pure and simple. And since, as I read the papers, the judge had discretion to transfer the case, it’s difficult to see why the NhRP thinks that its arguments will be persuasive.

I have to wonder whether the time and energy the lawyers have put into their arguments about venue could have been better spent lobbying for improved animal welfare laws, or asking the government to enforce existing laws for Happy’s benefit. Perhaps Happy would wonder the same thing, if she were a person.

3 responses to “Elephant Habeas Case: The NhRP Really, Really Does Not Want To Litigate Happy The Elephant’s Case In The Bronx”

  1. Tracy Tullis

    I have to wonder if the time and energy spent writing this poorly reasoned story would have been better spent learning some elemental facts about this elephant. Such as her gender. Happy is a female elephant.

    1. Thanks for the correction—I have updated the story to indicate Happy is a female elephant. I am not sure why that matters, but it’s good to be accurate!

  2. […] the same decision in a case brought by the same lawyers just three years ago. Indeed, Mr. Wise sought to have the case heard in another part of the state in order to get around the court’s earlier rejection of his theories, claiming, in a bit of […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.