Lago Agrio: Second Chance for Steven Donziger

Oil barrels in Ecuador

Steven Donziger has been given a second chance to save his law license. John R. Horan, the referee who will be conducting the next hearing in the New York bar’s disciplinary case against Steven Donziger has decided that Donziger should be allowed to challenge the factual basis on which Judge Kaplan found that he had committed fraud. The is the best news Donziger has had in a while, and it creates the possibility that a US court will eventually disagree with Judge Kaplan’s findings of fact.

The decision seems erroneous to me. As I understand it, the court has already determined that Donziger violated the rules of professional conduct, and the purpose of the upcoming hearing is to determine the sanction. It seems very odd to say that the findings to which the court gave preclusive effect as to liability should not have preclusive effect as to the sanction, and surely it is not open to the referee to make findings of fact that differ from the findings the court has already reached in the same proceeding. This point is independent of the point about whether Judge Kaplan’s findings of fact should be entitled to preclusive effect, but even if that were the question, I think there is a pretty strong case for applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel. But all that said, even if the referee’s decision is erroneous as a matter of law, I don’t see that it really prejudices anyone (Donziger is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, so no clients or potential clients will be prejudiced), and all else being equal, the more opportunity an accused lawyer is given to make his case, the better.

The Attorney Grievance Committee, which is in effect the prosecutor in the proceeding, has filed a strong objection to the referee’s decision. It appears the court will hear the objection on November 26, and Donziger has not yet responded to the objection. So it is not clear yet what will happen at the hearing Horan is scheduled to hold on December 4.

If the Horan decision stands, I think anything could happen. It’s not at all clear what evidence Donziger would seek to offer. We do know that Donziger says the hearing could be completed in two days, which suggests that he doesn’t have in mind relitigating the fraud claims in detail.

It’s probably too early to speculate about such things, but if Horan were to find, as a matter of fact, that Donziger had not committed a fraud, and if his findings were not reversed on the facts or the law, that would be huge news, and it could have unpredictable but important effects on the overall case, particularly in Canada. So stay tuned.

2 responses to “Lago Agrio: Second Chance for Steven Donziger”

  1. […] week or two ago I noted an upcoming attorney disciplinary hearing at which, it seemed, Steven Donziger would have the […]

  2. […] Back in November I noted a decision in the disciplinary case against Steven Donziger: the referee who was to decide the sanction Donziger will face had ruled that although Judge Kaplan’s findings of fact had had preclusive effect with respect to the question whether Donziger had violated the rules of professional conduct, the findings should not have preclusive effect with respect to the sanction. In other words, Donziger should be entitled to put on evidence to prove that Judge Kaplan’s findings were wrong at the hearing to be held on his sanction. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.