Lago Agrio: Argentina’s Attorney General Seeks Lifting of the Embargo

Argentina’s attorney general, Alejandra Magdalena Gils Carbó, has asked Argentina’s Supreme Court to lift the embargo or attachment of Chevron’s assets in Argentina, which the Argentine courts had entered under the Inter-American Convention on Execution of Preventive Measures. In November 2012, I reported on the embargo, and in January 2013 I reported on an Argentine appellate court’s decision affirming the embargo.

I don’t have a translation of the attorney general’s opinion yet, but as best as I can make out, her opinion was based at least in part on Argentina’s interest in economic development and sound energy policy, given Chevron’s role as a partner in the newly nationalized YPF. If I understand correctly, the decision also focuses on the distinction between Chevron Corp., the judgment debtor in Ecuador, and the Chevron subsidiaries or affiliates in Argentina that are the subjects of the embargo, as the Ontario judge focused on a similar distinction in the Yaiguaje decision. But I may have the Spanish all wrong on this, so Spanish-speaking readers and especially Argentine readers, please do feel free to chime in and correct me as appropriate. I would also welcome comments on the practical implications of the attorney general’s opinion—how likely is it to play a role in the Argentine courts’ final resolution of the embargo issue?

One response to “Lago Agrio: Argentina’s Attorney General Seeks Lifting of the Embargo”

  1. […] country and her request for action by the Argentine Supreme Court. Doug focuses on the two issues I mentioned in my post on the opinion: the application of the embargo to Chevron subsidiaries and affiliates […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.