Argentina’s Offer To Holdout Creditors Lacks Oomph

On March 29, as ordered by the Second Circuit, Argentina submitted its offer to its creditors who have been unwilling to exchange their securities for new securities Argentina issued after its default. I have to say that I don’t really understand the offer. As I read the document, Argentina is offering to exchange the old debt for its new, restructured debt on pretty much the same terms that plaintiffs such as NML Capital have already rejected.1 Why would NML surrender now, when it seems to be doing well in the US courts? And isn’t there a risk that the Second Circuit will get its dander up on account Argentina’s new show of intransigence in the face of Judge Griesa’s injunction?

  1. I took a look at some news coverage to make sure I wasn’t misunderstanding the document. Pan Kwan Yuk at the Financial Times and Bob Van Voris at Bloomberg seem to read the offer the same way I do.

One response to “Argentina’s Offer To Holdout Creditors Lacks Oomph”

  1. […] stay from the Second Circuit. The court granted its motion. The Second Circuit did, however, order Argentina to put its offer to its creditors in writing. Here was my response to the […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.