Lago Agrio: Huaorani Case Voluntarily Dismissed

I wrote a couple of days ago about the Huaorani motion for leave to intervene in Chevron’s RICO case against Donziger and others. I should have noted that on November 28 the Huaorani filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of their claims against Donziger in the separate civil action they had brought, which I reported on in July.

Since the Huaorani seek to assert cross-claims against Donziger as intervenors, and since the motion for leave to intervene has not yet been granted, it’s not clear to me why the Huaorani agreed to a voluntary dismissal of their claims in their separate action before getting a ruling on their motion for leave to intervene. Perhaps they should have sought to intervene only to defend the validity of the Ecuadoran judgment and should have sought to consolidate their own action with the RICO case. But these are just procedural niceties—assuming the motion for leave to intervene will be granted, it amounts to the same thing in the end.

2 responses to “Lago Agrio: Huaorani Case Voluntarily Dismissed”

  1. […] civil action against Donziger in New York, which they later voluntarily dismissed—a move that I found difficult to understand at the time. […]

  2. […] they claimed, neither Donziger nor the ADF was authorized to represent them. The Huaorani later voluntarily dismissed their case when it became clear that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction (because there were aliens […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for commenting! By submitting a comment, you agree that we can retain your name, your email address, your IP address, and the text of your comment, in order to publish your name and comment on Letters Blogatory, to allow our antispam software to operate, and to ensure compliance with our rules against impersonating other commenters.