-
Case of the Day: Sillam v. Labaton Sucharow
The case of the day is Sillam v. Labaton Sucharow LLP (S.D.N.Y. 2024). Sillam was a French businessman. According to his complaint, he and Descroubres, who was predecessor in interest to Sillam’s fellow plaintiff, Saulnier, had a fee-splitting agreement with Labaton Sucharow. Sillam was to get 15% of Labanon’s earnings from clients that Sillam referred……
-
The NYT article on UNRWA is a doozy
I am fascinated by yesterday’s article in the Times about UNRWA in Gaza. Here are some of the key points. When I read reporting like this, I am aghast at the UN’s see-no-evil, hear-no-evil approach to UNRWA. When Israel alleged that twelve UNRWA staffers had taken part in the October 7 massacre, the UN issued……
-
Case of the Day: Commonwealth v. Karen Read
The case of the day is Commonwealth v. Read (Mass. Super. Ct. 2024). This is not a typical Letters Blogatory case, but it has been in the headlines here in Massachusetts and, I think, elsewhere in America. I’m curious to know whether any readers abroad have heard of it! And there is a connection to……
-
Case of the Day: Wikeley v. Kea Investments
The case of the day is Wikeley v. Kea Investments, Ltd., [2024] NZCA 609. I learned of it from a post at Conflict of Laws by Maria Hook of the University of Otago. Kenneth Wikeley sued Kea Investments in Kentucky for breach of contract. The contract in question was a Coal Funding and JV Investment……
-
Case of the Day: AXS Group v. Internet Referral Services
The case of the day is AXS Group v. Internet Referral Services (C.D. Cal. 2024). AXS sued Amosa.app, a business that it claimed sold counterfeit AXS tickets online. Discovery revealed that Amosa.app was operated by someone named Altan Tanriverdi, who had an email address, a phone number, and a mailing address in Ankara, Turkey. AXS……