Archives

Case of the Day: Pinnacle Packaging Co. v. Constantia Flexibles GmbH

The case of the day is Pinnacle Packaging Co. v. Constantia Flexibles GmbH (N.D. Okla. 2015). Pinnacle and the other plaintiffs served a notice for the deposition of Thomas Unger, the CEO of Constantia, and for the depositions of corporate representatives of Constantia and One Equity Partners. Unger resides in Germany. Constantia’s offices are in Austria, and One Equity’s officers are in Germany. The depositions were to take place in New York. The defendants moved for a protective order, arguing that the depositions should take place in Germany and Austria rather than in New York.
Continue reading Case of the Day: Pinnacle Packaging Co. v. Constantia Flexibles GmbH

Case of the Day: Corraro v. Moody International

The case of the day is Corraro v. Moody International (N.D. Okla. 2012). The plaintiff, Vickie F. Corrara, sued Moody International, also known as Intertek, for sexual harassment during her employment with Moody. Moody was a UK entitly. For reasons that are unclear, Corraro’s lawyer addressed the summons to Intertek Testing Services, a subsidiary of Moody. Corraro served the summons on ITS’s registered agent for service of process. Moody did not answer, and Corraro sought a default judgment.

The judge correctly recognized that where the defendant is in a Hague Convention state, the question whether service on a foreign company’s US subsidiary is valid is a question to be decided under the law of the forum under Volkswagen. The judge determined that under the factors prescribed by Oklahoma law, Corraro had failed to show that ITS was Moody’s agent or alter ego for service of process purposes. Therefore, the service was improper, and the judge denied the motion for a default judgment.