Comments for Letters Blogatory

Comment on Taking Evidence from Prince Andrew by Liana

Liana — Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:25:26 +0000

thanks for info.

Comment on Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case by Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:57:16 +0000

In reply to Peter Lynn. Good point!

Comment on Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case by Peter Lynn

Peter Lynn — Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:51:27 +0000

In reply to Ted Folkman. Also because in the UK a defamation case has to be filed within a year, and this was broadcast Oct 24.

Comment on Mayor Mamdani has his autopen moment on Day 1 by Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Sun, 04 Jan 2026 22:59:12 +0000

I think this NYT article supports my point. The Mayor started with the decision to revoke the city’s adoption of the IHRA working definition and its rejection of BDS and then ginned up an explanation that allowed him to “frame the choice as a matter of good governance.” Yuck.

Comment on Case of the Day: ECS Brands v. Brubeck by Martha A Hurtado

Martha A Hurtado — Sat, 03 Jan 2026 07:29:30 +0000

I am a victim of identity theft, please removed my profile. Thanks

Comment on Mayor Mamdani has his autopen moment on Day 1 by Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:39:39 +0000

In reply to Nathan. Also, I don't mind criticism at all—I welcome it—but if you are going to write that I "often veer into caricature or half-truth," perhaps tell me who you are?

Comment on Mayor Mamdani has his autopen moment on Day 1 by Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Fri, 02 Jan 2026 16:43:45 +0000

In reply to Nathan. Thanks for reading! Doesn't your point strengthen, rather than weaken, my argument? The new mayor also promised, I think, to retain the old mayor's commission on antisemitism, even though it was established after his indictment. So what we can take from that is that the mayor has enabled BDS and rejected the IHRA working definition not because of a process concern, but because he is opposed to them.

Comment on Mayor Mamdani has his autopen moment on Day 1 by Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 02 Jan 2026 16:14:00 +0000

EO 2 reinstated in full the direction about protests near houses of worship, FYI. You often veer into caricature or half-truth on this topic, and this is no exception.

Comment on Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case by Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Mon, 29 Dec 2025 19:36:30 +0000

In reply to Jonathan Berger. I suspect it's because in the UK the loser can be on the hook for the winner's fees.

Comment on Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case by Jonathan Berger

Jonathan Berger — Thu, 25 Dec 2025 19:12:03 +0000

I had the same reaction when I found out that the lawsuit is in a US court: if you’re suing an English entity for libel, why not do it in an English court, where you might actually win? Makes no sense.