<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the day: Dinwang Jia v. Individuals on Schedule A	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/#comment-59991</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=39591#comment-59991</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/#comment-59990&quot;&gt;Michael La Porte&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for commenting! You are right that the opinion lacks any real explanation of why the Convention bar service of process by email in China when the defendant&#039;s address is known. At some point I hope we will have an Eleventh Circuit opinion, but it may not be anytime soon!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/#comment-59990">Michael La Porte</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting! You are right that the opinion lacks any real explanation of why the Convention bar service of process by email in China when the defendant&#8217;s address is known. At some point I hope we will have an Eleventh Circuit opinion, but it may not be anytime soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael La Porte		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2026/09/29/case-of-the-day-dinwang-jia-v-individuals-on-schedule-a/#comment-59990</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael La Porte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=39591#comment-59990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Without any analysis, Judge Bloom also assumed that the Hague Service Convention applied - departing from her numerous earlier decisions holding that China&#039;s failure to object to e-mail allowed such service. Without much fanfare, this is quite the reversal in the SDFLA - a venue that Sched. A. plaintiffs may try to retreat to now that 2nd Cir and 7th Cir have become inhospitable on the service front.

DISLOSURE: I was the defense attorney for HYHA in this case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without any analysis, Judge Bloom also assumed that the Hague Service Convention applied &#8211; departing from her numerous earlier decisions holding that China&#8217;s failure to object to e-mail allowed such service. Without much fanfare, this is quite the reversal in the SDFLA &#8211; a venue that Sched. A. plaintiffs may try to retreat to now that 2nd Cir and 7th Cir have become inhospitable on the service front.</p>
<p>DISLOSURE: I was the defense attorney for HYHA in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
