Comments on: The Special Commission on Service by Email, Part 1 https://lettersblogatory.com/2024/07/18/the-special-commission-on-service-by-email-part-1/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Tue, 31 Dec 2024 14:46:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Paper of the Day: Gardner and Dodge on the Email and the Service Convention | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2024/07/18/the-special-commission-on-service-by-email-part-1/#comment-25454 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 14:46:05 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=33112#comment-25454 […] by pointing out that the 2024 conclusion and recommendation on this topic, which I covered in a post from July, says that article 10(a) includes transmission and service by email. But I would still want to say […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: PNC Bank v. Baglien | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2024/07/18/the-special-commission-on-service-by-email-part-1/#comment-22444 Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:29:05 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=33112#comment-22444 […] which plainly does permit service by ordinary mail, and which may permit service by email, if you think that email is within the scope of the term “postal […]

]]> By: Ted Folkman https://lettersblogatory.com/2024/07/18/the-special-commission-on-service-by-email-part-1/#comment-16473 Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:44:22 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=33112#comment-16473 In reply to Alexander Moskovits.

Thank you for the comment. The post doesn’t really have to do with service on foreign states or their instrumentalities, which is governed by the FSIA rather than FRCP 4

]]> By: Alexander Moskovits https://lettersblogatory.com/2024/07/18/the-special-commission-on-service-by-email-part-1/#comment-16444 Sat, 20 Jul 2024 05:31:14 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=33112#comment-16444 Generous of you to share this knowledge and the link to the transnational litigation blog. Eye opener. Filing a Rule 4(f) motion to served by e-mail where contracts at issue expressly allowed it and signatories were Republic of Brazil and three subsovereign states of Brazil expressly agreed to be served by email. Gamesmanship to not allow foreseeable third party non-signatory to serve by email especially given all of the past shown gamesmanship. Many thanks!

]]>