<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lago Agrio: Supreme Court Denies Donziger&#8217;s Petition For Review of His Contempt Conviction.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4803</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 02:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=31596#comment-4803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4802&quot;&gt;Mark Kantor&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for the comment! I think that the unique nature of the case probably cut against a grant. But I also think the implications of the case for separation of powers doctrine generally made a grant a really hard sell for the liberal justices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4802">Mark Kantor</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment! I think that the unique nature of the case probably cut against a grant. But I also think the implications of the case for separation of powers doctrine generally made a grant a really hard sell for the liberal justices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Kantor		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kantor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=31596#comment-4802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Folkman,

Pure speculation on my part, but I incline towards the idea that the great majority of Justices thought the Donziger prosecution was a one-off, therefore not justifying certiorari.  Of course, the stern opinion by Justices Gorsuch/Kavanaugh might deter another judge from copying Judge Kaplan and the Second Circuit majority in the future if another situation of obstructive party conduct provoked that other judge to consider appointing a special prosecutor again.

MK]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Folkman,</p>
<p>Pure speculation on my part, but I incline towards the idea that the great majority of Justices thought the Donziger prosecution was a one-off, therefore not justifying certiorari.  Of course, the stern opinion by Justices Gorsuch/Kavanaugh might deter another judge from copying Judge Kaplan and the Second Circuit majority in the future if another situation of obstructive party conduct provoked that other judge to consider appointing a special prosecutor again.</p>
<p>MK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4801</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=31596#comment-4801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4795&quot;&gt;Albéniz Couret Fuentes&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the comment! I think that views on the nondelegation doctrine and separation of powers really are left/right disagreements today, but I take your point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4795">Albéniz Couret Fuentes</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment! I think that views on the nondelegation doctrine and separation of powers really are left/right disagreements today, but I take your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Albéniz Couret Fuentes		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2023/03/27/lago-agrio-supreme-court-denies-donzigers-petition-for-review-of-his-contempt-conviction/#comment-4795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albéniz Couret Fuentes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=31596#comment-4795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ted,

Thanks for always keeping us up to date with your informative posts.

I’ll just say that I’m skeptical about whether that sort of “left-right” categorization remains useful. Obviously, I can’t speak for Donzinger’s supporters (or his detractors), but I think that most people genuinely form their views on specific issues unconcerned about how these would be categorized based on what seems to me an outdated paradigm.

Regards!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ted,</p>
<p>Thanks for always keeping us up to date with your informative posts.</p>
<p>I’ll just say that I’m skeptical about whether that sort of “left-right” categorization remains useful. Obviously, I can’t speak for Donzinger’s supporters (or his detractors), but I think that most people genuinely form their views on specific issues unconcerned about how these would be categorized based on what seems to me an outdated paradigm.</p>
<p>Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
