<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics v. Venezuela	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/#comment-3614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=30706#comment-3614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/#comment-3613&quot;&gt;kotodama&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s an interesting point! Under the FSIA, a &quot;special arrangement for service&quot; can be the proper way to serve process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/#comment-3613">kotodama</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting point! Under the FSIA, a &#8220;special arrangement for service&#8221; can be the proper way to serve process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kotodama		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2022/02/08/case-of-the-day-saint-gobain-performance-plastics-v-venezuela/#comment-3613</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kotodama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=30706#comment-3613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I note that the underlying arbitration was pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty (BIT).  From the perspective of Saint-Gobain or a similar party suffering expropriation, could this problem be fixed in the future by including provisions in new or revised BITs that require a sovereign like Venezuela to consent in advance to service or at least allow more convenient (for a party enforcing an award) service methods?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that the underlying arbitration was pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty (BIT).  From the perspective of Saint-Gobain or a similar party suffering expropriation, could this problem be fixed in the future by including provisions in new or revised BITs that require a sovereign like Venezuela to consent in advance to service or at least allow more convenient (for a party enforcing an award) service methods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
