<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Service on Prince Andrew: Thumbs Up, or Thumbs Down?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/#comment-3581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=30466#comment-3581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/#comment-3580&quot;&gt;Steven Loble&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Steven! I agree with you that it would be a mistake for the defendant to appear at all in the NY case if his intention is to take the default. &quot;Run silent, run deep&quot; is the best rule in such cases. But it appears that a US lawyer has entered an appearance on the Duke of York&#039;s behalf, which tells me that he does not intend to challenge service, since now the judge is highly likely to approve a request for alternative service by service on the US lawyer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/#comment-3580">Steven Loble</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Steven! I agree with you that it would be a mistake for the defendant to appear at all in the NY case if his intention is to take the default. &#8220;Run silent, run deep&#8221; is the best rule in such cases. But it appears that a US lawyer has entered an appearance on the Duke of York&#8217;s behalf, which tells me that he does not intend to challenge service, since now the judge is highly likely to approve a request for alternative service by service on the US lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Loble		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/09/10/service-on-prince-andrew-thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down/#comment-3580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Loble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=30466#comment-3580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ted

An additional point - the media suggests that Prince Andrew&#039;s lawyers are relying on a settlement agreement between the Plaintiff and Epstein.  Firstly, that is probably subject to a NDA (insidious though that may be), and secondly, if they decide to default, if they have filed any papers with the NY court, that would be a defence on the merits and could well constitute a submission to the jurisdiction, which would make a default judgment, which might otherwise be unenforceable, enforceable.

Steven Loble]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted</p>
<p>An additional point &#8211; the media suggests that Prince Andrew&#8217;s lawyers are relying on a settlement agreement between the Plaintiff and Epstein.  Firstly, that is probably subject to a NDA (insidious though that may be), and secondly, if they decide to default, if they have filed any papers with the NY court, that would be a defence on the merits and could well constitute a submission to the jurisdiction, which would make a default judgment, which might otherwise be unenforceable, enforceable.</p>
<p>Steven Loble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
