<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tenth Anniversary Post: Peter Bert on the Future of IJA	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Geert van Calster		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/#comment-3543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geert van Calster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29646#comment-3543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/#comment-3541&quot;&gt;Ted Folkman&lt;/a&gt;.

Most useful, Peter, many thanks. No doubt a post you will want to revisit in say 5 years time for stocktaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/#comment-3541">Ted Folkman</a>.</p>
<p>Most useful, Peter, many thanks. No doubt a post you will want to revisit in say 5 years time for stocktaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Future of International Judicial Assistance &#124; Dispute Resolution Germany		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/#comment-3542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Future of International Judicial Assistance &#124; Dispute Resolution Germany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29646#comment-3542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] post first appeared on Ted Folkman&#8217;s Letters Blogatory, which is celebrating its 10th anniversary &#8211; if you don&#8217;t know that blog yet, do check [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post first appeared on Ted Folkman&#8217;s Letters Blogatory, which is celebrating its 10th anniversary &#8211; if you don&#8217;t know that blog yet, do check [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2021/01/13/tenth-anniversary-post-peter-bert-on-the-future-of-ija/#comment-3541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29646#comment-3541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this, Peter! It is good to think about steps backward and how we deal with them, and not only to focus on steps forward. To answer your question: I am not aware of any really active movement towards ratification of COCA. That doesn&#039;t necessarily mean one isn&#039;t underway. As you may recall, the main barrier to ratification several years ago was not any real disagreement about the merits of the Convention, but byzantine infighting about whether the Convention should be implemented in federal law (by analogy to the FAA) or in state law (by analogy to existing law on judgment recognition). This was, in some sense, a fight between the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and everyone else. In any case, I suspect that the incoming administration and the Senate are going to have much bigger fish to fry for the foreseeable future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this, Peter! It is good to think about steps backward and how we deal with them, and not only to focus on steps forward. To answer your question: I am not aware of any really active movement towards ratification of COCA. That doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean one isn&#8217;t underway. As you may recall, the main barrier to ratification several years ago was not any real disagreement about the merits of the Convention, but byzantine infighting about whether the Convention should be implemented in federal law (by analogy to the FAA) or in state law (by analogy to existing law on judgment recognition). This was, in some sense, a fight between the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and everyone else. In any case, I suspect that the incoming administration and the Senate are going to have much bigger fish to fry for the foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
