<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Gyger v. Clement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/#comment-3498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29542#comment-3498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/#comment-3497&quot;&gt;Robert Boylan&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the comment. An affidavit can be on oath or affirmation, but the affirmation still has to be made before a notary or another proper officer. An unsworn declaration, e.g., a declaration under 28 U.S.C. &#167; 1746, is absolutely proper and usually the easiest way to do things, as long as the applicable rules allow it. By the way, you haven&#039;t seen seals and ribbons until you have had to do an old-fashioned &quot;chain legalization&quot; to prepare a public document for use in a country that is not a party to the Apostille Convention!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/#comment-3497">Robert Boylan</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. An affidavit can be on oath or affirmation, but the affirmation still has to be made before a notary or another proper officer. An unsworn declaration, e.g., a declaration under 28 U.S.C. &sect; 1746, is absolutely proper and usually the easiest way to do things, as long as the applicable rules allow it. By the way, you haven&#8217;t seen seals and ribbons until you have had to do an old-fashioned &#8220;chain legalization&#8221; to prepare a public document for use in a country that is not a party to the Apostille Convention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Boylan		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/11/06/case-of-the-day-gyger-v-clement/#comment-3497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Boylan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29542#comment-3497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oath or affirmation. When drafting something for subission to a court, I used the heading &quot;Unsworn Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury&quot; with a statutory citation as well. Never had a problem even though some old school types want to see ribbons and seals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oath or affirmation. When drafting something for subission to a court, I used the heading &#8220;Unsworn Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury&#8221; with a statutory citation as well. Never had a problem even though some old school types want to see ribbons and seals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
