<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 23:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/#comment-3489</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 23:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29493#comment-3489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/#comment-3488&quot;&gt;Salem&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you! I will take a look.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/#comment-3488">Salem</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you! I will take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Salem		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/10/05/supreme-court-update-2/#comment-3488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29493#comment-3488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WPL v SAS is a fascinating case. It was a blockbuster in the ECJ, then a new case filed in the US, and the enforcement is now the subject of angry duelling injunctions between the UK and US. The UK Court of Appeal&#039;s response to the 4th Circuit decision that WPL is appealing from is well worth reading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPL v SAS is a fascinating case. It was a blockbuster in the ECJ, then a new case filed in the US, and the enforcement is now the subject of angry duelling injunctions between the UK and US. The UK Court of Appeal&#8217;s response to the 4th Circuit decision that WPL is appealing from is well worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
