<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Canada v. Merlini: Brief in Opposition Filed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29160#comment-3411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3410&quot;&gt;Caroline Polisi&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks! Probably everything reads better when it&#039;s printed in the fancy SCOTUS format.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3410">Caroline Polisi</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks! Probably everything reads better when it&#8217;s printed in the fancy SCOTUS format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Caroline Polisi		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3410</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Polisi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 02:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29160#comment-3410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Awesome brief, Ted!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome brief, Ted!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29160#comment-3409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3408&quot;&gt;Mark Bravin&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Mark! It&#039;s interesting what you say about the vehicle problems. I&#039;ve talked about the case with a few SCOTUS types who have had various views, but I tend to agree with you that there&#039;s no strong reason for the court to take the case now if it&#039;s going to have to consider taking it again later. We shall see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3408">Mark Bravin</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Mark! It&#8217;s interesting what you say about the vehicle problems. I&#8217;ve talked about the case with a few SCOTUS types who have had various views, but I tend to agree with you that there&#8217;s no strong reason for the court to take the case now if it&#8217;s going to have to consider taking it again later. We shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Bravin		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/21/canada-v-merlini-brief-in-opposition-filed/#comment-3408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Bravin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29160#comment-3408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ted&#8212;congratulations on a very well-constructed and persuasive brief in opposition to Canada’s cert. petition.  Argument C&#8212;that your case is not the right vehicle&#8212;strikes me as the most difficult for Canada’s counsel to rebut.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted&mdash;congratulations on a very well-constructed and persuasive brief in opposition to Canada’s cert. petition.  Argument C&mdash;that your case is not the right vehicle&mdash;strikes me as the most difficult for Canada’s counsel to rebut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
