Comments on: Case of the Day: Rockefeller v. Changzhou SinoType https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:24:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Case of the Day: Voltage Pictures v. Gussi | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-11455 Sat, 09 Mar 2024 21:38:09 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-11455 […] readers will know what I think about this. The Convention is an agreement between states, and its provisions are not for the parties to […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Clear Spring v. Arch Nemesis | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-7514 Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:51:11 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-7514 […] international dimension, and the case came before the Service Convention came into force. Despite a California case to the contrary, because the Convention is exclusive, if you are serving a party in a foreign […]

]]> By: Note of the Day: Vanderbeek on Rockefeller | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-5437 Mon, 15 May 2023 10:01:07 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-5437 […] Review on the problem of “contracting around” the Hague Service Convention in light of Rockefeller v. Changzhou Sinotype. Vanderbeek correctly identifies two approaches to the problem. The first approach focuses on […]

]]> By: Changzhou Sinotype Technology Co., Ltd, Hague Service Convention and Judgment Enforcement in China – Conflict of Laws https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-3407 Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:09:12 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-3407 […] The Changzhou Sinotype Technology Co, Ltd has a number of interesting aspects and has been commented such as here, here and here. […]

]]> By: Cert. Watch: Changzhou SinoType v. Rockefeller | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-3406 Thu, 20 Aug 2020 23:22:15 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-3406 […] v. Rockefeller Investments (Asia) VII, a case from the California Supreme Court that you’ll remember from this spring. Here are the facts in a nutshell. A US company wins a big arbitral award against a Chinese company […]

]]> By: Supreme Court of California (ROCKEFELLER TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS (ASIA) v. CHANGZHOU SINOTYPE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD). A European reading of the ruling https://lettersblogatory.com/2020/04/13/case-of-the-day-rockefeller-v-changzhou-sinotype/#comment-3405 Fri, 15 May 2020 14:44:07 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=29133#comment-3405 […] the 1965 Hague Service Convention. The case has been thoroughly reported and commented before and after  the ruling of the Supreme Court. I will refrain from giving the full picture of the facts; I will […]

]]>