<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ingrid Wuerth on Personal Jurisdiction and the Fifth Amendment Due Process Rights of Foreign Sovereigns and State-Owned Enterprises	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/07/29/ingrid-wuerth-on-personal-jurisdiction-and-the-fifth-amendment-due-process-rights-of-foreign-sovereigns-and-state-owned-enterprises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/07/29/ingrid-wuerth-on-personal-jurisdiction-and-the-fifth-amendment-due-process-rights-of-foreign-sovereigns-and-state-owned-enterprises/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/07/29/ingrid-wuerth-on-personal-jurisdiction-and-the-fifth-amendment-due-process-rights-of-foreign-sovereigns-and-state-owned-enterprises/#comment-3321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28513#comment-3321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ingrid, thank you for posting this and congratulations on the paper. It is thought-provoking. Let me put the following hypothetical to you: The executive branch, acting under authority of a statute, blocks the assets in the United States of a state that it designates as a state sponsor of terrorism. Should the foreign state have a right to a pre-deprivation hearing? If not, can it claim later that the action was an unconstitutional deprivation of its property?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingrid, thank you for posting this and congratulations on the paper. It is thought-provoking. Let me put the following hypothetical to you: The executive branch, acting under authority of a statute, blocks the assets in the United States of a state that it designates as a state sponsor of terrorism. Should the foreign state have a right to a pre-deprivation hearing? If not, can it claim later that the action was an unconstitutional deprivation of its property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
