<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Merlini v. Canada	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 11:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-52300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comments on the Trump v. BBC libel case &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 11:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-52300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] immunity . I commented on a similar issue a few years ago when I opposed a cert. petition in Merlini v. Canada, a case I brought (and won!) against the government of Canada on behalf of a locally-engaged worker [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] immunity . I commented on a similar issue a few years ago when I opposed a cert. petition in Merlini v. Canada, a case I brought (and won!) against the government of Canada on behalf of a locally-engaged worker [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Mohammad v. Consulate of Kuwait &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-22093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Mohammad v. Consulate of Kuwait &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-22093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] readers will know that the issue is interesting to me: it was the issue in Merlini v. Canada 926 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2019), the First Circuit&#8217;s decision in favor of a worker injured on the job at a consulate who [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] readers will know that the issue is interesting to me: it was the issue in Merlini v. Canada 926 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2019), the First Circuit&#8217;s decision in favor of a worker injured on the job at a consulate who [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Dover Amendment and the FSIA &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-17872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dover Amendment and the FSIA &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-17872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] not the purpose. But it&#8217;s not a simple test to apply. Long-time readers will remember my case against the government of Canada, where the issue was the Canadian government&#8217;s failure to [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not the purpose. But it&#8217;s not a simple test to apply. Long-time readers will remember my case against the government of Canada, where the issue was the Canadian government&#8217;s failure to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brownbag Lunch of the Day: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Locally Employed Staff: the Massachusetts Example &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownbag Lunch of the Day: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Locally Employed Staff: the Massachusetts Example &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Immunity and Locally Employed Staff: the Massachusetts Example. We&#8217;re going to talk about the Merlini case, the case in which a clerical worker at a foreign consulate had a workplace injury and the foreign [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Immunity and Locally Employed Staff: the Massachusetts Example. We&#8217;re going to talk about the Merlini case, the case in which a clerical worker at a foreign consulate had a workplace injury and the foreign [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cert. Watch: Merlini v. Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cert. Watch: Merlini v. Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] written about before in which I&#8217;m representing the plaintiff. I last wrote about the case in June 2019, when I reported on the First Circuit decision in Merlini&#8217;s favor. To recap, this is the case [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] written about before in which I&#8217;m representing the plaintiff. I last wrote about the case in June 2019, when I reported on the First Circuit decision in Merlini&#8217;s favor. To recap, this is the case [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3284&quot;&gt;Alan Pierce&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Alan, that&#039;s super nice!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3284">Alan Pierce</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Alan, that&#8217;s super nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Pierce		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ted’s willingness to take this most unique case on and pursue so far successfully is what good lawyering is all about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted’s willingness to take this most unique case on and pursue so far successfully is what good lawyering is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3282&quot;&gt;Richard Garnett&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Richard, that&#039;s very kind! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3282">Richard Garnett</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Richard, that&#8217;s very kind! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Garnett		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/06/11/case-of-the-day-merlini-v-canada/#comment-3282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Garnett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28371#comment-3282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congratulations Ted— an excellent victory for a consular employee over another foreign state employer seeking to use the immunity doctrine to defeat good faith claims. I hope you have further success on the merits.

Best wishes
Richard Garnett]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Ted— an excellent victory for a consular employee over another foreign state employer seeking to use the immunity doctrine to defeat good faith claims. I hope you have further success on the merits.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Richard Garnett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
