Comments on: Case of the Day: NOCO Co. v. Chang https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/05/21/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-chang/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:31:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Case of the Day: Topstone Communications v. Chenyi Xu | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/05/21/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-chang/#comment-22092 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:03:05 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28300#comment-22092 […] in 2019, courts began to take a fresh look. In cases such as NOCO Co. v. Chang and Luxottica Group v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations, courts recognized that because […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Luxottica Group v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/05/21/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-chang/#comment-3275 Tue, 28 May 2019 10:02:18 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28300#comment-3275 […] correctly, that since the Convention did apply, service by email in China is improper. This is the second case in just a few days to make this point. Is the tide turning? The judge’s reasoning was spot […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Dunhuang Group | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/05/21/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-chang/#comment-3274 Wed, 22 May 2019 10:00:48 +0000 https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=28300#comment-3274 […] Is it proper to serve a subpoena by email in China? The answer to that, I think, has to be no, for the reasons that Judge Gwin gave in yesterday’s case of the day. Service in China must comport with the Service Convention, which in China means serving through […]

]]>