<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: New Prime Inc. v. Oliveiera	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/#comment-3239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=27932#comment-3239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/#comment-3238&quot;&gt;Steven Skulnik&lt;/a&gt;.

That is a very good point. After all, the MUAA applies to any &quot;written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitration,&quot; except &quot;collective bargaining agreements to arbitrate.&quot; So the quirky limitations of the FAA aren&#039;t an issue under the Massachusetts statute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/#comment-3238">Steven Skulnik</a>.</p>
<p>That is a very good point. After all, the MUAA applies to any &#8220;written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitration,&#8221; except &#8220;collective bargaining agreements to arbitrate.&#8221; So the quirky limitations of the FAA aren&#8217;t an issue under the Massachusetts statute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Skulnik		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2019/01/18/case-of-the-day-new-prime-inc-v-oliveiera/#comment-3238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Skulnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=27932#comment-3238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found it curious that New Prime did not, in the alternative, seek to compel arbitration under the Massachusetts Uniform Arbitration Act for Commercial Disputes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it curious that New Prime did not, in the alternative, seek to compel arbitration under the Massachusetts Uniform Arbitration Act for Commercial Disputes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
