<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 04:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Biomet Orthopaedics &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/#comment-22279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of Biomet Orthopaedics &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26962#comment-22279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the Third Circuit&#8217;s decision with the Second Circuit&#8217;s recent decision in Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore LLP (2d Cir. 2018). There the court, in a similar scenario, reversed a grant of a § 1782 application, holding, in [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Third Circuit&#8217;s decision with the Second Circuit&#8217;s recent decision in Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP (2d Cir. 2018). There the court, in a similar scenario, reversed a grant of a § 1782 application, holding, in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: ACL Netherlands BV v. Lynch &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/#comment-3107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: ACL Netherlands BV v. Lynch &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26962#comment-3107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I think it is useful to consider the case alongside Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore, in which the Second Circuit disapproved of attempts to use &#167; 1782 to direct a subpoena to a [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I think it is useful to consider the case alongside Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine &#038; Moore, in which the Second Circuit disapproved of attempts to use &sect; 1782 to direct a subpoena to a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Recent developments in Micula and Kiobel - international litigation blog		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/#comment-3106</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recent developments in Micula and Kiobel - international litigation blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26962#comment-3106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to produce the requested documents. That decision was later reversed by the Second Circuit (click here for an excellent report by Ted [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to produce the requested documents. That decision was later reversed by the Second Circuit (click here for an excellent report by Ted [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cert. Watch: Kiobel v. Cravath &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/07/13/case-of-the-day-kiobel-v-cravath-swaine-moore/#comment-3105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cert. Watch: Kiobel v. Cravath &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26962#comment-3105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Circuit reversed, holding that the lower court had abused its discretion. As I highlighted in my prior post, the key to the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision (which I criticized) seems to be that the Dutch [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Circuit reversed, holding that the lower court had abused its discretion. As I highlighted in my prior post, the key to the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision (which I criticized) seems to be that the Dutch [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
