<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Green v. First Liberty	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/05/11/case-of-the-day-green-v-first-liberty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/05/11/case-of-the-day-green-v-first-liberty/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Levy		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/05/11/case-of-the-day-green-v-first-liberty/#comment-3090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Levy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26784#comment-3090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;if we start handing out Rule 11 sanctions every time a lawyer misunderstands the FSIA …&quot;

Yup.  And to the commenter, as an insurance defense attorney, I see plenty of plaintiff&#039;s attorneys and defense attorneys filing motions/pleadings that could be deemed as frivolous. However, just because you have an argument that will probably lose, does not mean the argument is frivolous.  The courts should not be punishing any lawyers for making arguments that may be seen as &quot;Hail Mary passes.&quot;  Sometimes, the &quot;Hail Mary Pass&quot; succeeds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;if we start handing out Rule 11 sanctions every time a lawyer misunderstands the FSIA …&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup.  And to the commenter, as an insurance defense attorney, I see plenty of plaintiff&#8217;s attorneys and defense attorneys filing motions/pleadings that could be deemed as frivolous. However, just because you have an argument that will probably lose, does not mean the argument is frivolous.  The courts should not be punishing any lawyers for making arguments that may be seen as &#8220;Hail Mary passes.&#8221;  Sometimes, the &#8220;Hail Mary Pass&#8221; succeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen C. Woodruff		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2018/05/11/case-of-the-day-green-v-first-liberty/#comment-3089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Woodruff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 02:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=26784#comment-3089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a plaintiff&#039;s attorney who has to deal with outrageous defense counsel tactics all the time&#8212;frivolous arguments and delay tactics, especially from government lawyers&#8212;I would like to see more judges like this one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a plaintiff&#8217;s attorney who has to deal with outrageous defense counsel tactics all the time&mdash;frivolous arguments and delay tactics, especially from government lawyers&mdash;I would like to see more judges like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
