<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Noco Co. v. Shenzen Dika Na&#8217;Er E-Commerce Co.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/#comment-3002</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25720#comment-3002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/#comment-3001&quot;&gt;Aaron Lukken&lt;/a&gt;.

Aaron, I think you&#039;re right. In a case like this, there&#039;s probably no question about trying to go to China to enforce a judgment; what the plaintiff probably wants is a judgment, even a default judgment, that it can show Amazon to get the infringing products taken off the web. So failing to look too hard for the defendant given the costs involved might well be a sound decision&#8212;but it&#039;s hard to say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/#comment-3001">Aaron Lukken</a>.</p>
<p>Aaron, I think you&#8217;re right. In a case like this, there&#8217;s probably no question about trying to go to China to enforce a judgment; what the plaintiff probably wants is a judgment, even a default judgment, that it can show Amazon to get the infringing products taken off the web. So failing to look too hard for the defendant given the costs involved might well be a sound decision&mdash;but it&#8217;s hard to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron Lukken		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/11/30/case-of-the-day-noco-co-v-shenzen-dika-naer-e-commerce-co/#comment-3001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Lukken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25720#comment-3001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If I understand the facts... the plaintiff didn&#039;t bother hiring a Chinese investigator to search for the company?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand the facts&#8230; the plaintiff didn&#8217;t bother hiring a Chinese investigator to search for the company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
