<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chinese Court Recognizes US Commercial Money Judgment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Legal Mazes in the US/China IP Dispute &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/#comment-2918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Mazes in the US/China IP Dispute &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25262#comment-2918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] and enforce foreign judgments related to IP in China. Chinese courts have recognised and enforced some foreign judgments based on the principle of reciprocity, but never for IP-related cases. And this doesn&#8217;t look like changing [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and enforce foreign judgments related to IP in China. Chinese courts have recognised and enforced some foreign judgments based on the principle of reciprocity, but never for IP-related cases. And this doesn&#8217;t look like changing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Legal mazes in the US–China IP dispute &#124; East Asia Forum		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/#comment-2917</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal mazes in the US–China IP dispute &#124; East Asia Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25262#comment-2917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] and enforce foreign judgments related to IP in China. Chinese courts have recognised and enforced some foreign judgments based on the principle of reciprocity, but never for IP-related cases. And this doesn’t look like changing [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and enforce foreign judgments related to IP in China. Chinese courts have recognised and enforced some foreign judgments based on the principle of reciprocity, but never for IP-related cases. And this doesn’t look like changing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Qiu v. Zhang &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/#comment-2916</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Qiu v. Zhang &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25262#comment-2916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] he just had to allege it. Still, it is good to see the trend of comity in this area in light of the recent big news about China&#8217;s recognition of a US commercial [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] he just had to allege it. Still, it is good to see the trend of comity in this area in light of the recent big news about China&#8217;s recognition of a US commercial [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: China Signs COCA &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/#comment-2915</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China Signs COCA &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25262#comment-2915</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] signing is a hopeful sign, particularly in light of a Chinese court&#8217;s recent decision recognizing a US commercial judgment. In my post on the Chinese recognition decision, I suggested [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] signing is a hopeful sign, particularly in light of a Chinese court&#8217;s recent decision recognizing a US commercial judgment. In my post on the Chinese recognition decision, I suggested [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thoughts on The Chinese Decision On Recognizing a US Judgment &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/09/04/chinese-court-recognizes-us-commercial-money-judgment/#comment-2914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thoughts on The Chinese Decision On Recognizing a US Judgment &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25262#comment-2914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] you haven&#8217;t read Dr. Jie Huang&#8217;s important report on a Chinese court&#8217;s unprecedented recognition of a US commercial money judgment, read it [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you haven&#8217;t read Dr. Jie Huang&#8217;s important report on a Chinese court&#8217;s unprecedented recognition of a US commercial money judgment, read it [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
