<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Thought Experiment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/#comment-2912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25170#comment-2912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/#comment-2911&quot;&gt;Jack&lt;/a&gt;.

Ding ding ding! Rawls is one of the folks I had in mind, of course. The other main author is Thomas Nagel. And note that neither of these authors, nor I, am saying that the only view worth taking is the objective view. Rawls has the idea of &quot;reflective equilibrium,&quot; and one of Nagel&#039;s big projects is the integration of the subjective and the objective perspectives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/#comment-2911">Jack</a>.</p>
<p>Ding ding ding! Rawls is one of the folks I had in mind, of course. The other main author is Thomas Nagel. And note that neither of these authors, nor I, am saying that the only view worth taking is the objective view. Rawls has the idea of &#8220;reflective equilibrium,&#8221; and one of Nagel&#8217;s big projects is the integration of the subjective and the objective perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/08/16/thought-experiment/#comment-2911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25170#comment-2911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In so many words, this sounds like John Rawls&#039;s &quot;veil of ignorance.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In so many words, this sounds like John Rawls&#8217;s &#8220;veil of ignorance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
