<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case to Watch: LaVenture v. United Nations	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/07/04/case-to-watch-laventure-v-united-nations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/07/04/case-to-watch-laventure-v-united-nations/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Laventure v. United Nations &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/07/04/case-to-watch-laventure-v-united-nations/#comment-2905</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Laventure v. United Nations &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=25004#comment-2905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case of the day is Laventure v. United Nations (E.D.N.Y. 2017). I noted the case back in July. It&#8217;s a follow-on to Georges v. United Nations, the Second Circuit case [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day is Laventure v. United Nations (E.D.N.Y. 2017). I noted the case back in July. It&#8217;s a follow-on to Georges v. United Nations, the Second Circuit case [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
