<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Water Splash v. Menon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Dunhuang Group &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-22148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Dunhuang Group &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-22148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] process in the strict sense and not to service of other judicial documents. I think Water Splash is wrong on this point, but in any case a subpoena is process in the strict [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] process in the strict sense and not to service of other judicial documents. I think Water Splash is wrong on this point, but in any case a subpoena is process in the strict [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Signify North America v. Axis Lighting &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Signify North America v. Axis Lighting &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] general jurisdiction.&#8221; The judge&#8217;s mistake on this point is curious, because she cited Water Splash v. Menon, the case in which the Supreme Court made explicit the distinction between methods of service that [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] general jurisdiction.&#8221; The judge&#8217;s mistake on this point is curious, because she cited Water Splash v. Menon, the case in which the Supreme Court made explicit the distinction between methods of service that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Water Splash: The Denouement &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Water Splash: The Denouement &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Water Splash v. Menon, 137 S. Ct. 1504 (2017), the Supreme Court finally resolved the question of whether Article 10(a) of the Hague Service [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Water Splash v. Menon, 137 S. Ct. 1504 (2017), the Supreme Court finally resolved the question of whether Article 10(a) of the Hague Service [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Moore v. Toyota &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Moore v. Toyota &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to postal service. However, as the judge recognized, and as the Supreme Court recently held in Water Splash, the Convention merely permits, but does not authorize service by mail. Moore pointed to Louisiana [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to postal service. However, as the judge recognized, and as the Supreme Court recently held in Water Splash, the Convention merely permits, but does not authorize service by mail. Moore pointed to Louisiana [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Seaboard Marine v. Magnum Freight &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Seaboard Marine v. Magnum Freight &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The judge had good instincts, but I think his discussion was problematic, especially in light of Water Splash. Here is what he [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The judge had good instincts, but I think his discussion was problematic, especially in light of Water Splash. Here is what he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hague Mail Service… if you must do it, do it right. &#124; Hague Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hague Mail Service… if you must do it, do it right. &#124; Hague Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Splash doesn’t get into the weeds&#8212;and Ted rightly criticizes Justice Alito’s otherwise spot-on opinion for avoiding the authorization/permission question.  Then again, Water Splash was a Texas state [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Splash doesn’t get into the weeds&mdash;and Ted rightly criticizes Justice Alito’s otherwise spot-on opinion for avoiding the authorization/permission question.  Then again, Water Splash was a Texas state [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] problem with the decision is that, despite the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent guidance, the judge&#8217;s decision seems to suppose that Article 10 does not just permit, but [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] problem with the decision is that, despite the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent guidance, the judge&#8217;s decision seems to suppose that Article 10 does not just permit, but [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Bulmer v. Nissan Motor Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Bulmer v. Nissan Motor Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 10:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] served. Bulmer appealed.  The issue the court confronted was similar to one of the issues in Water Splash v. Menon, but with a peculiarly Canadian twist. In Water Splash, the Court noted that Article 10(a) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] served. Bulmer appealed.  The issue the court confronted was similar to one of the issues in Water Splash v. Menon, but with a peculiarly Canadian twist. In Water Splash, the Court noted that Article 10(a) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 12:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2877&quot;&gt;Ian D. Withers&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Ian! Just be sure to remind US counsel to make sure that service by mail is authorized by local procedural law. In other words, they need to be careful not to overread the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2877">Ian D. Withers</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Ian! Just be sure to remind US counsel to make sure that service by mail is authorized by local procedural law. In other words, they need to be careful not to overread the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian D. Withers		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/23/case-of-the-day-water-splash-v-menon/#comment-2877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian D. Withers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24839#comment-2877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting Report Ted, appreciated, this permits us to advice US Law Offices who seek clarity as to whether we can Serve, or they can Mail (Send)

Many thanks for the update]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Report Ted, appreciated, this permits us to advice US Law Offices who seek clarity as to whether we can Serve, or they can Mail (Send)</p>
<p>Many thanks for the update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
