<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: CE Design Ltd. v. HealthCraft Products	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/10/case-of-the-day-ce-design-ltd-v-healthcraft-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/10/case-of-the-day-ce-design-ltd-v-healthcraft-products/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: ECO Heating Systems v. Hamilton Engineering &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/05/10/case-of-the-day-ce-design-ltd-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: ECO Heating Systems v. Hamilton Engineering &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 10:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24791#comment-2874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of a foreign judgment and a claim that the foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction, just like yesterday&#8217;s case. But I want to focus on an odd issue of arbitrability in the case [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of a foreign judgment and a claim that the foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction, just like yesterday&#8217;s case. But I want to focus on an odd issue of arbitrability in the case [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
