<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Supreme Court, Service of Process, and Legal History: Part 2 of a Letters Blogatory Polemic	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/04/17/polemic-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/04/17/polemic-part-2/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 17:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Lunn v. Commonwealth &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/04/17/polemic-part-2/#comment-2867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Lunn v. Commonwealth &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24669#comment-2867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to say that at common law there was no civil power of arrest. At common law, as we saw in my two posts on service of process in the olden days, at a certain period of development it was not just [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to say that at common law there was no civil power of arrest. At common law, as we saw in my two posts on service of process in the olden days, at a certain period of development it was not just [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Supreme Court, Service of Process, and Legal History: Part 3 of a Letters Blogatory Polemic &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/04/17/polemic-part-2/#comment-2866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Supreme Court, Service of Process, and Legal History: Part 3 of a Letters Blogatory Polemic &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24669#comment-2866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] post in my series on service of process and legal history. I encourage you to read the first and second [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post in my series on service of process and legal history. I encourage you to read the first and second [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
