<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: CE Design v. HealthCraft Products	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron Lukken		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2846</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Lukken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24491#comment-2846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2845&quot;&gt;Ted Folkman&lt;/a&gt;.

I often pose that scenario to litigators seeking to sue foreign companies here in the U.S.  So what if you get good service and a default judgment... how are you going to collect on it if a foreign court doesn&#039;t think the U.S. court has jurisdiction over their citizen?

An issue pondered far too seldom by American litigators.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2845">Ted Folkman</a>.</p>
<p>I often pose that scenario to litigators seeking to sue foreign companies here in the U.S.  So what if you get good service and a default judgment&#8230; how are you going to collect on it if a foreign court doesn&#8217;t think the U.S. court has jurisdiction over their citizen?</p>
<p>An issue pondered far too seldom by American litigators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24491#comment-2845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2844&quot;&gt;Aaron Lukken&lt;/a&gt;.

Aaron, the answer is &quot;maybe.&quot; I think it depends on factors including: (1) CE&#039;s perception of the quality of the foreign court; (2) how close CE thought the issue was; (3) issues about cost and delay; etc. One important point is that the standard that the Canadian court used to decide that it had personal jurisdiction is not necessarily the standard the Illinois court would use to decide whether the Canadian judgment was void if CE had defaulted. Courts disagree about the standard to be applied (I don&#039;t know about Illinois specifically).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2844">Aaron Lukken</a>.</p>
<p>Aaron, the answer is &#8220;maybe.&#8221; I think it depends on factors including: (1) CE&#8217;s perception of the quality of the foreign court; (2) how close CE thought the issue was; (3) issues about cost and delay; etc. One important point is that the standard that the Canadian court used to decide that it had personal jurisdiction is not necessarily the standard the Illinois court would use to decide whether the Canadian judgment was void if CE had defaulted. Courts disagree about the standard to be applied (I don&#8217;t know about Illinois specifically).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron Lukken		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/03/20/case-of-the-day-ce-design-v-healthcraft-products/#comment-2844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Lukken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24491#comment-2844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, a strategic question... would CE Design have been better off simply ignoring the Canadian proceeding?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a strategic question&#8230; would CE Design have been better off simply ignoring the Canadian proceeding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
