<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Water Splash: Notes on Volkswagen from the new ABA Treatise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/16/water-splash-aba-treatise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/16/water-splash-aba-treatise/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 02:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: G2A v. United States &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/16/water-splash-aba-treatise/#comment-22111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: G2A v. United States &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24352#comment-22111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] (in my prior post on the case and in my chapter in the ABA Treatise on international litigation, which I discussed in February 2017), mainly on the grounds that the Convention applies to transmission of judicial and extrajudicial [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (in my prior post on the case and in my chapter in the ABA Treatise on international litigation, which I discussed in February 2017), mainly on the grounds that the Convention applies to transmission of judicial and extrajudicial [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: G2A.com v. United States &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/16/water-splash-aba-treatise/#comment-2835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: G2A.com v. United States &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24352#comment-2835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] are sound grounds in the precedents for making this distinction. But I have argued that this distinction, while reflected in some US cases, is a bad reading of the Convention itself. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] are sound grounds in the precedents for making this distinction. But I have argued that this distinction, while reflected in some US cases, is a bad reading of the Convention itself. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Hague Service Convention doesn’t just apply to process &#124; Hague Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/16/water-splash-aba-treatise/#comment-2834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hague Service Convention doesn’t just apply to process &#124; Hague Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24352#comment-2834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] than I am&#8211; although he disagrees with the Hyundai decision he described back in 2012 and in his excellent follow-up column last month (for an even more thorough discussion, see Ted&#8217;s chapter in the latest ABA deskbook, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] than I am&#8211; although he disagrees with the Hyundai decision he described back in 2012 and in his excellent follow-up column last month (for an even more thorough discussion, see Ted&#8217;s chapter in the latest ABA deskbook, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
