<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Book of the Day: International Aspects of U.S. Litigation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/15/book-of-the-day-international-aspects-of-u-s-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/15/book-of-the-day-international-aspects-of-u-s-litigation/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Development Specialists v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/15/book-of-the-day-international-aspects-of-u-s-litigation/#comment-22461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Development Specialists v. Li &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24344#comment-22461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Okay. First, because there is no objection to service by postal channels in Hong Kong, we know that China&#8217;s objection to service under Article 10(a) is irrelevant. Second, let&#8217;s just assume (with lots of justification) that FedEx, a private courier service, is part of the &#8220;postal channel.&#8221; (I addressed this point briefly in a 2012 post, and I deal with it in greater depth in the new ABA treatise). [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Okay. First, because there is no objection to service by postal channels in Hong Kong, we know that China&#8217;s objection to service under Article 10(a) is irrelevant. Second, let&#8217;s just assume (with lots of justification) that FedEx, a private courier service, is part of the &#8220;postal channel.&#8221; (I addressed this point briefly in a 2012 post, and I deal with it in greater depth in the new ABA treatise). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Moore v. Toyota &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/15/book-of-the-day-international-aspects-of-u-s-litigation/#comment-2833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Moore v. Toyota &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24344#comment-2833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] How does this statute apply here? Here is a brief excerpt from my chapter in the ABA treatise: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] How does this statute apply here? Here is a brief excerpt from my chapter in the ABA treatise: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Water Splash: Notes on Volkswagen from the new ABA Treatise &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2017/02/15/book-of-the-day-international-aspects-of-u-s-litigation/#comment-2832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Water Splash: Notes on Volkswagen from the new ABA Treatise &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=24344#comment-2832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] publication of the new ABA treatise, which I noted yesterday, reminded me that I had already written about the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] publication of the new ABA treatise, which I noted yesterday, reminded me that I had already written about the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
