<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Harrison v. Sudan	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/#comment-2652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23381#comment-2652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] is Republic of Sudan v. Harrison (S. Ct. 2019). I&#8217;ve covered the case several times before; my post on the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision on Sudan&#8217;s petition for a rehearing was my most recent substantive look, and guest author Jared Hubbard reported more recently on the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is Republic of Sudan v. Harrison (S. Ct. 2019). I&#8217;ve covered the case several times before; my post on the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision on Sudan&#8217;s petition for a rehearing was my most recent substantive look, and guest author Jared Hubbard reported more recently on the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sudan v. Harrison: The Oral Argument &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/#comment-2651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sudan v. Harrison: The Oral Argument &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23381#comment-2651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] affairs, via the Sudanese embassy in Washington, under 28 U.S.C. &#167; 1608(a)(3). Before the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision holding that the service was sufficient, I should have said that the service was obviously [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] affairs, via the Sudanese embassy in Washington, under 28 U.S.C. &sect; 1608(a)(3). Before the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision holding that the service was sufficient, I should have said that the service was obviously [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/#comment-2650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 12:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23381#comment-2650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Supreme Court granted a cert. petition in Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, which I covered back in 2016. The issue is whether you can comply with the FSIA&#8217;s service requirements by sending the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Supreme Court granted a cert. petition in Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, which I covered back in 2016. The issue is whether you can comply with the FSIA&#8217;s service requirements by sending the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kumar v. Sudan (With a Circuit Split!) &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/#comment-2649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kumar v. Sudan (With a Circuit Split!) &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23381#comment-2649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] decision is particularly at interesting because it is at odds with 2016 post on Harrison v. Sudan, a Second Circuit case I covered last year. In Harrison, the court allowed this method of service, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] decision is particularly at interesting because it is at odds with 2016 post on Harrison v. Sudan, a Second Circuit case I covered last year. In Harrison, the court allowed this method of service, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cert. Watch: Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/26/case-day-harrison-v-sudan/#comment-2648</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cert. Watch: Sudan v. Harrison &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23381#comment-2648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] in Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, a case we&#8217;ve covered twice before (first decision, second decision). Here was my description of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, a case we&#8217;ve covered twice before (first decision, second decision). Here was my description of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
