<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Vivian Curran on FSIA Immunity and Genocide In The Restatement (Fourth)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/07/vivian-curran-fsia-immunity-genocide-restatement-fourth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/07/vivian-curran-fsia-immunity-genocide-restatement-fourth/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/09/07/vivian-curran-fsia-immunity-genocide-restatement-fourth/#comment-2632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=23267#comment-2632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[

I&#039;m highly sympathetic to efforts of the heirs of Holocaust victims to recover looted property, including art. Still, I find the reasoning of &lt;em&gt;Simon&lt;/em&gt; unpersuasive. What does it mean to say that expropriation is not just a means of carrying out genocide, but genocide itself? For legal and political reasons, I think it is important to police the boundaries of how we define genocide, and outright theft, even if motivated by racial hatred (for example), just isn&#039;t the same as genocide as defined, for example, in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m highly sympathetic to efforts of the heirs of Holocaust victims to recover looted property, including art. Still, I find the reasoning of <em>Simon</em> unpersuasive. What does it mean to say that expropriation is not just a means of carrying out genocide, but genocide itself? For legal and political reasons, I think it is important to police the boundaries of how we define genocide, and outright theft, even if motivated by racial hatred (for example), just isn&#8217;t the same as genocide as defined, for example, in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
