<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Puerto Rico v. Sánches Valle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/14/case-day-puerto-rico-v-sanches-valle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/14/case-day-puerto-rico-v-sanches-valle/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/14/case-day-puerto-rico-v-sanches-valle/#comment-2556</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 10:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22741#comment-2556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] original colonies, and that it is a legal fiction for all of the other states. I wrote about this in my post on Puerto Rico v. Sanches Valle, a case on the application of the &#8220;dual sovereignty&#8221; rule under the Double Jeopardy [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] original colonies, and that it is a legal fiction for all of the other states. I wrote about this in my post on Puerto Rico v. Sanches Valle, a case on the application of the &#8220;dual sovereignty&#8221; rule under the Double Jeopardy [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Livnat v. Palestinian Authority &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/14/case-day-puerto-rico-v-sanches-valle/#comment-2555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Livnat v. Palestinian Authority &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22741#comment-2555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I mentioned in my discussion of Puerto Rico v. Sánches Valle, I&#8217;m wary of constitutional tests that rely [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I mentioned in my discussion of Puerto Rico v. Sánches Valle, I&#8217;m wary of constitutional tests that rely [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Igartúa v. Obama &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/14/case-day-puerto-rico-v-sanches-valle/#comment-2554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Igartúa v. Obama &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22741#comment-2554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] unlikely to me, particularly in light of Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Trust and Puerto Rico v. Sánches Valle, that the Supreme Court would have much sympathy for the view that the Constitution requires that [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unlikely to me, particularly in light of Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Trust and Puerto Rico v. Sánches Valle, that the Supreme Court would have much sympathy for the view that the Constitution requires that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
