<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Comcast v. Hourani	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/#comment-2548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22681#comment-2548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/#comment-2547&quot;&gt;Inforrm Editorial&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks--helpful!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/#comment-2547">Inforrm Editorial</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks&#8211;helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Inforrm Editorial		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/06/01/case-day-comcast-v-hourani/#comment-2547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inforrm Editorial]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22681#comment-2547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The English court gives permission to serve Comcast out of the jurisdiction on the basis that it is a necessary and proper party to the action - see the decision in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3423.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Lockton Companies v Persons Unknown&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The English court gives permission to serve Comcast out of the jurisdiction on the basis that it is a necessary and proper party to the action &#8211; see the decision in <em><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3423.html" rel="nofollow ugc">Lockton Companies v Persons Unknown</a>.</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
