<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: PJS v. News Group Newspapers Ltd.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/04/11/case-day-pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/04/11/case-day-pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Letters Blogatory&#8217;s Annual Appeal for the ABA Blawg 100 Nomination &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/04/11/case-day-pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd/#comment-2503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Letters Blogatory&#8217;s Annual Appeal for the ABA Blawg 100 Nomination &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2017 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22408#comment-2503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] My post on PJS v. News Group Newspapers, the English invasion of privacy injunction case, which I think got a lot of readers because Google liked the fact that I quoted the judge describing the facts of the case: &#8220;the three met for a three-way sexual encounter which they duly carried out.&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] My post on PJS v. News Group Newspapers, the English invasion of privacy injunction case, which I think got a lot of readers because Google liked the fact that I quoted the judge describing the facts of the case: &#8220;the three met for a three-way sexual encounter which they duly carried out.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Top Posts of 2016 &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/04/11/case-day-pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd/#comment-2502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts of 2016 &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22408#comment-2502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Case of the Day: PJS v. News Group Newspapers. Can you say prurient? This was the case about an unnamed English celebrity who obtained a super-injunction to prevent publication of a sexual peccadillo. No doubt people were googling for the finer points of the balancing of the right to free expression under Article 10 of the ECHR against the right to privacy under Article 8. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Case of the Day: PJS v. News Group Newspapers. Can you say prurient? This was the case about an unnamed English celebrity who obtained a super-injunction to prevent publication of a sexual peccadillo. No doubt people were googling for the finer points of the balancing of the right to free expression under Article 10 of the ECHR against the right to privacy under Article 8. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
