<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Bazarian International v. Aerohotelco	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/02/24/22270/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/02/24/22270/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:35:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Article of the Day: Bill Dodge on Substituted Service - Folkman LLC		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/02/24/22270/#comment-2487</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Article of the Day: Bill Dodge on Substituted Service - Folkman LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22270#comment-2487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] long-arm statutes are another example. But let me raise a procedural issue I&#8217;ve raised before,1 in the hopes that Bill might give some thoughts. While long-arm statutes are incorporated into the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] long-arm statutes are another example. But let me raise a procedural issue I&#8217;ve raised before,1 in the hopes that Bill might give some thoughts. While long-arm statutes are incorporated into the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Products &#038; Ventures v. Axus Stationery &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/02/24/22270/#comment-2486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Products &#038; Ventures v. Axus Stationery &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22270#comment-2486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Probably unsurprisingly, the court did not consider the textual issue we&#8217;ve discussed before: whether FRCP 4(f)(3) can ever permit service on a foreign defendant&#8217;s US counsel, given that FRCP 4(f) applies only when the defendant is to &#8220;be served at a place not within any judicial district of the United States.&#8221; Only a few courts have taken that textual point seriously. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Probably unsurprisingly, the court did not consider the textual issue we&#8217;ve discussed before: whether FRCP 4(f)(3) can ever permit service on a foreign defendant&#8217;s US counsel, given that FRCP 4(f) applies only when the defendant is to &#8220;be served at a place not within any judicial district of the United States.&#8221; Only a few courts have taken that textual point seriously. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
