<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case to Watch: Schermerhorn v. Israel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/13/case-watch-schermerhorn-v-israel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/13/case-watch-schermerhorn-v-israel/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Doğan v. Barak &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/13/case-watch-schermerhorn-v-israel/#comment-2461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Doğan v. Barak &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22070#comment-2461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla lawfare&#8221; genre, Schermerhorn v. Israel, three times (when it was filed, at the district court, and in the DC Circuit). Ahmet and Himet Doğan, both Turkish nationals, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla lawfare&#8221; genre, Schermerhorn v. Israel, three times (when it was filed, at the district court, and in the DC Circuit). Ahmet and Himet Doğan, both Turkish nationals, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Schermerhorn v. Israel &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/13/case-watch-schermerhorn-v-israel/#comment-2460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Schermerhorn v. Israel &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22070#comment-2460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case of the day is Schermerhorn v. State of Israel (D.D.C. 2017). We first took a look in January 2016, and I&#8217;ve written about another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case of the day is Schermerhorn v. State of Israel (D.D.C. 2017). We first took a look in January 2016, and I&#8217;ve written about another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Doğan v. Barak &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/13/case-watch-schermerhorn-v-israel/#comment-2459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Doğan v. Barak &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22070#comment-2459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] This is another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla lawfare&#8221; genre. I previously wrote about Schermerhorn v. Israel, where a motion to dismiss is yet to be decided. The Schermerhorn case is a FSIA case, because the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is another case in the &#8220;Gaza flotilla lawfare&#8221; genre. I previously wrote about Schermerhorn v. Israel, where a motion to dismiss is yet to be decided. The Schermerhorn case is a FSIA case, because the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
