<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Genger v. Genger	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/#comment-2458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22028#comment-2458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/#comment-2457&quot;&gt;Stephen C Woodruff&lt;/a&gt;.

Stephen, I agree it&#039;s confusing. It&#039;s possible I made a mistake, but as I understand it both Sagi and then Parnes challenged the second subpoena. I haven&#039;t tried to capture all the intricacies of the procedure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/#comment-2457">Stephen C Woodruff</a>.</p>
<p>Stephen, I agree it&#8217;s confusing. It&#8217;s possible I made a mistake, but as I understand it both Sagi and then Parnes challenged the second subpoena. I haven&#8217;t tried to capture all the intricacies of the procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen C Woodruff		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2016/01/08/case-of-the-day-genger-v-genger/#comment-2457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C Woodruff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 01:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=22028#comment-2457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused.  Perhaps there is some error in the writing, although not in any of the substance.  Didn&#039;t the subpoena call for Parnes to testify?  Wasn&#039;t it Parnes who voluntarily appeared for the New York deposition, at the request of &quot;close friend&quot; Sagi Genger?  Who actually tried to quash the second subpoena, Sagi Genger or Parnes?

Aside from that, as always, I love the substance of your cases of the day.  Always an excellent precis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused.  Perhaps there is some error in the writing, although not in any of the substance.  Didn&#8217;t the subpoena call for Parnes to testify?  Wasn&#8217;t it Parnes who voluntarily appeared for the New York deposition, at the request of &#8220;close friend&#8221; Sagi Genger?  Who actually tried to quash the second subpoena, Sagi Genger or Parnes?</p>
<p>Aside from that, as always, I love the substance of your cases of the day.  Always an excellent precis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
