<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Certain Funds v. KPMG	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/#comment-2248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=21061#comment-2248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/#comment-2247&quot;&gt;jwb&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, JWB!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/#comment-2247">jwb</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, JWB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jwb		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/08/24/case-of-the-day-certain-funds-v-kpmg/#comment-2247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=21061#comment-2247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1. Related judgments from the JCPC are &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2014-0040-judgment.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2013-0114-judgment.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s a pretty fascinating case, and the JCPC decision provides vital context that the CA2 decision glosses over.

2. No one mentioned the &quot;&#8230; including criminal investigations conducted before formal accusation&quot; modifier to &quot;for use in a foreign or international tribunal&quot;. Couldn&#039;t the funds have argued that the sukuk issuer is akin to the prosecutor mulling over a charging decision? Since the statute appears to contemplate potential targets of a criminal investigation using discovery to influence criminal investigations prior to formal accusation, there is at least a weak argument by analogy the funds could have used here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Related judgments from the JCPC are <a href="https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2014-0040-judgment.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">here</a> and <a href="https://www.jcpc.uk/cases/docs/jcpc-2013-0114-judgment.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">here</a>.  It&#8217;s a pretty fascinating case, and the JCPC decision provides vital context that the CA2 decision glosses over.</p>
<p>2. No one mentioned the &#8220;&hellip; including criminal investigations conducted before formal accusation&#8221; modifier to &#8220;for use in a foreign or international tribunal&#8221;. Couldn&#8217;t the funds have argued that the sukuk issuer is akin to the prosecutor mulling over a charging decision? Since the statute appears to contemplate potential targets of a criminal investigation using discovery to influence criminal investigations prior to formal accusation, there is at least a weak argument by analogy the funds could have used here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
