<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Core VCT plc v. Hensley	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/04/06/case-of-the-day-core-vct-plc-v-hensley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/04/06/case-of-the-day-core-vct-plc-v-hensley/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case to Watch: In re POSCO &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/04/06/case-of-the-day-core-vct-plc-v-hensley/#comment-2185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case to Watch: In re POSCO &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20408#comment-2185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] E. Pfander and Daniel D. Birk on the non-contentious jurisdiction of the US district courts, as I said I would a few days ago, there may well be deep jurisdictional questions lurking behind &#167; 1782, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] E. Pfander and Daniel D. Birk on the non-contentious jurisdiction of the US district courts, as I said I would a few days ago, there may well be deep jurisdictional questions lurking behind &sect; 1782, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
