<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Mobil Cerro Negro v. Venezuela	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/27/case-of-the-day-mobil-cerro-negro-v-venezuela/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/27/case-of-the-day-mobil-cerro-negro-v-venezuela/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Micula v. Government of Romania &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/27/case-of-the-day-mobil-cerro-negro-v-venezuela/#comment-2131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Micula v. Government of Romania &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 10:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20156#comment-2131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] (Ex parte confirmation is a well-established procedure in the SDNY; I discussed the issue in a post on Mobil Cerro Negro v. Venezuela). ICSID later constituted an ad hoc committee to consider whether the award should be stayed [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Ex parte confirmation is a well-established procedure in the SDNY; I discussed the issue in a post on Mobil Cerro Negro v. Venezuela). ICSID later constituted an ad hoc committee to consider whether the award should be stayed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
