<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Safra v. Palestinian Authority	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/24/case-of-the-day-safra-v-palestinian-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/24/case-of-the-day-safra-v-palestinian-authority/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sokolow v. PLO &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/24/case-of-the-day-safra-v-palestinian-authority/#comment-22509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sokolow v. PLO &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20188#comment-22509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] day is Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization (2d Cir. 2016). I wrote about a similar case, Safra v. Palestinian Authority, back in 2015. The gist of the earlier case, which was decided in Washington, was that the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] day is Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization (2d Cir. 2016). I wrote about a similar case, Safra v. Palestinian Authority, back in 2015. The gist of the earlier case, which was decided in Washington, was that the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Conundrum of the Day: Palestinian Statehood &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/24/case-of-the-day-safra-v-palestinian-authority/#comment-2135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conundrum of the Day: Palestinian Statehood &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20188#comment-2135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Safra v. Palestinian Authority, a case I wrote about in February 2015, the court held that the Palestinian Authority did have rights under the Due Process Clause and [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Safra v. Palestinian Authority, a case I wrote about in February 2015, the court held that the Palestinian Authority did have rights under the Due Process Clause and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Gilmore v. Palestinian Authority &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2015/02/24/case-of-the-day-safra-v-palestinian-authority/#comment-2134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Gilmore v. Palestinian Authority &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lettersblogatory.com/?p=20188#comment-2134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the position that Palestine is a state and therefore entitled to FSIA sovereign immunity, while in Safra v. Palestinian Authority and Sokolow v. PLO, it took the contrary position in order to assert lack of personal jurisdiction [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the position that Palestine is a state and therefore entitled to FSIA sovereign immunity, while in Safra v. Palestinian Authority and Sokolow v. PLO, it took the contrary position in order to assert lack of personal jurisdiction [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
